Dating sitethe bahamas community
Furthermore, with the experiment you claim he cites that shows a "sample millions of years old was extracted successfully", while acknowledging the authors' care in doing the experiment, consistent with his scepticism over DNA being extracted from fossils millions of years old Lindahl casts doubt on their findings (p. Lindahl says that the DNA not rejected as contamination, was "somewhat arbitrarily assigned as being representative of the [termite] fossil". Lindahl: "It will now be important to assess the reproducibility of such findings." He then goes on to criticize another claim of DNA found in a magnolia leaf said to be 20 million years old.
However, he says that air-dried tissues remain partly hydrated and susceptible to decay and that dessicated DNA, where the water in the grooves of the DNA double helix is removed, is susceptible to accelerated damage.
So, I stand by my characterization of this work that it argues against DNA lasting for millions of years.
Coal is a powerful evidence for Noah's Flood; the evolutionary story of it forming from material laid down in peat bog swamps over eons of time just does not stack up.
The author's doctorate in science is often used to defend the veracity of the "101 evidences." However, a degree in plant science earned through the study of the mung bean would hardly give him the authority or expertise required to fully comprehend the evidence used in the Geological, Radiometrical, Astronomical, and Historical subsections which make up 90 of the 101 evidences.
And they're satisfied with that because they already have an easily-accessible and stable food source that is not going to kill them.
Since it is easy to fish and hunt with sticks and stones, they'd have more time for leisure, entertainment, music, arts, etc.
The economic viability of producing coal and oil depends on many things and is quite irrelevant to the matter of experiments that have shown how quickly coal and oil can form (it does not need millions of years). However, there is one thing that I want to argue with you: the origin of agriculture.
"Secular dating puts it at about 10,000 years and yet that same chronology says that modern man has supposedly been around for at least 200,000 years.
It only speaks of ways in which DNA is damaged in living cells - (which fossils are clearly not).
In fact, it mentions an experiment in which DNA from a sample millions of years old was extracted successfully.
I recently found out about this site/tomb they are digging up in between SYRIA and TURKEY that's "supposed" to re-write our history books. If those who support the creation ideas feel that they have a better understanding of how oil and gas form, then they should form a company to look for such commodities using their ideas. So far as I know, there is no law that restricts oil and gas exploration to those who believe in evolution. in finding oil and gas: see what geologist Dr John Morris said.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating